Skip to content

Sexy time, very nice

So following on with Kansas City choosing function over form in the playoffs, we have Ruud Gullit promising to bring “sexy football” to America. Remember, you can’t spell “Los Angeles Galaxy” without SEXY GOALS.*

A casual glance at the Galaxy roster reveals that Gullit has a near-total lack of players able to actually play in a way someone would want to make love to. If we define “sexy” as “attacking,” the Galaxy will run into the same problem Kansas City did – disciplined defense patient enough to wait for mistakes, skilled enough to force mistakes and talented enough to exploit them. 1-0 against; repeat. Cover Beckham and Donovan, and the rest of the team will make the bad pass or botch the good one. Our old friend entropy makes it easier to destroy than create, so an attacking team can’t attack as well as the other team defends, it must attack measurably better. The laws of physics are against attacking soccer.

If we define “sexy” as “total football” in the Dutch style, the Galaxy might conceivably have a bigger problem. The number of American players who are acceptable in enough different facets of the game as to qualify as a total footballer can be counted on the fingers of a Weeble. Coaches, by and large, simply don’t teach that style of play. It’s easier to teach a player to do one thing good, and it’s easier to draw up strategy based on players knowing their one role.

So the Galaxy have announced their intention to find the most talented and rarest of players. It’s very easy to picture a conversation along these lines:

Ruud: Here are my tactics; they are a masterpiece of elegance.
Cobi: Here are our players; give them a five minute head start and they can tie their own shoes.
Bravo: Here is our budget; under the salary cap we can buy a set of orange cones.
Ruud: Orange! How thoughtful of you.

Fine, so the salary cap is as mythical as the untapped market of millions of Americans waiting for Premiership level of play from MLS. If DC United can bring in Luciano Emilio and Christian Gomez, and Guillermo Barros Schelotto can be brought in by Columbus, without flexing a DP spot, then better uses of time and resources can be used on the Carlos Pavon spot. (And the Abel Xavier spot, although he still lives on in the Galaxy website’s title bar, so he might not be gone yet.) But even assuming you get outfield spots 1-10 ready, the first substitution or injury puts you back into subtotal football. This might be a longer and more painful process than the Galaxy seem to realize. But Holland wasn’t built in a day.

Oh…and forget about bringing in Dutch players. The one thing a Dutch superstar hates more than anything is a coach, and the one thing a Dutch superstar hates even more than a coach is another Dutch superstar. There’s a reason Holland exports so many wonderful coaches who thrive in foreign clubs and national teams – because they don’t have to deal with other Dutchmen.

EDIT to correct an inelegance – sexy blogging is my goal

*This is a “Greatest Hits” joke from 2002 or so, to replace the “American Pie” joke that WAS here, and which is still my joke so don’t try to steal it, okay?!

8 Comments

  1. Ned Zuparko wrote:

    From Lonnie Donegan to Borat. You are a Renaissance man! BTW, the 5 minute shoe-tying dialogue was hilarious.
    Liewicke says AEG is “reinventing the sport” so I assume that your thinking about what the team can and cannot be expected to do is now obsolete and hidebound.

    Sunday, November 11, 2007 at 9:38 pm | Permalink
  2. KT wrote:

    Two things I can’t stand: Those who are intolerant of other people’s cultures, and the damn Dutch.

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 10:17 am | Permalink
  3. Steven Deeley wrote:

    Where is Holland? What is the Netherlands? And who the hell are the Dutch?

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 10:47 am | Permalink
  4. Martek wrote:

    Now that’s what I call building a brand!!

    When is AEG going to call the whole thing off, say that, yes indeed they want to own only one MLS team, then sell the Galaxy and keep Dynamo? It’s starting to look more and more like an attractive option when you think about it:
    Houston: 30,000+ and diverse crowd with exciting, attacking team showing multiple looks
    LA: Brand-building and losing on a grand scale and on a big stage

    So long LA

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 10:50 am | Permalink
  5. KT wrote:

    Houston: A stadium that was a product of the Works Progress Administration.

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 11:21 am | Permalink
  6. Mike Mazzer wrote:

    Didn’t the Galaxy try “sexy” football when one of its first players was Andrew Shue?

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink
  7. Eric B wrote:

    Would someone remind Martek what the Galaxy were drawing even pre-Beckham and during/post-Sampson compared to what Houston drew during the past two regular seasons. (Not to denigrate their ticket selling acumen the last two matches, which has been exemplary).

    SoCalaphobia truly is an ugly thing…

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink
  8. Tommie wrote:

    Plus, Houston’s stadium lacks the thing that AEG covets – a stage.

    Monday, November 12, 2007 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. » Blog Archive » That’s Why He’s Here on Monday, November 12, 2007 at 9:25 am

    [...] this, ladies and jellyspoons, is why Dan Loney is the funniest guy writing about American soccer today. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.